- Jun 7, 2006
- 1,323
- 145
apart from this woman being a Sikh, what does this episode have anything to do with so called "Sikh persecution" by govt of india?
Was she there representing Sikhs or State of punjab or as a specialist of the field?
I think she was there as a specialist of the field with respect to punjab, not sikhs
Did she present data regarding sikh and non sikhs?
i think she presented data on punjab and disputed the government data. She might be correct, but what does it have to do with Sikhs and where is the "sikh persecution"
it's funny how people twist an incident to make it look like a conspiracy against sikhs
btw
punjab has only 63% population as Sikhs and there are more punjabi speakers in pakistan than india
worldwide there are more non sikh speakers of punjabi than sikhs
Sikhs do not have a "divine" right over punjabi, the language existed long before Sikhs
it's time we remove our tinted glasses and look at the incident objectively.
Was she there representing Sikhs or State of punjab or as a specialist of the field?
I think she was there as a specialist of the field with respect to punjab, not sikhs
Did she present data regarding sikh and non sikhs?
i think she presented data on punjab and disputed the government data. She might be correct, but what does it have to do with Sikhs and where is the "sikh persecution"
it's funny how people twist an incident to make it look like a conspiracy against sikhs
btw
punjab has only 63% population as Sikhs and there are more punjabi speakers in pakistan than india
worldwide there are more non sikh speakers of punjabi than sikhs
Sikhs do not have a "divine" right over punjabi, the language existed long before Sikhs
it's time we remove our tinted glasses and look at the incident objectively.