The problem seems to be a lack of trust in the GOI census.
What I am about to show you is something really cool…
What about the East India company?…surely there was no plot back in 1871 to paint the Sikhs as leaders of female infanticide.
http://www.chaf.lib.latrobe.edu.au/dcd/page.php?title=1881v2&action=next&record=537
main site:
http://www.chaf.lib.latrobe.edu.au/dcd/census.htm
turns out that in 1871 census shows a significant sex ratio discrepancy as well!
There were 10,210,053 males to 8,640,384 females in Punjab…a ratio of 0.8462
This is lower ratio than most other states under British Raj
Again more statistical consistency with that of the GOI census...things starting to look bleaker.
Lets stop denying the SEVERITY of the problem…it would be the first step in trying to fix it.
What I am about to show you is something really cool…
What about the East India company?…surely there was no plot back in 1871 to paint the Sikhs as leaders of female infanticide.
http://www.chaf.lib.latrobe.edu.au/dcd/page.php?title=1881v2&action=next&record=537
main site:
http://www.chaf.lib.latrobe.edu.au/dcd/census.htm
turns out that in 1871 census shows a significant sex ratio discrepancy as well!
There were 10,210,053 males to 8,640,384 females in Punjab…a ratio of 0.8462
This is lower ratio than most other states under British Raj
Again more statistical consistency with that of the GOI census...things starting to look bleaker.
Lets stop denying the SEVERITY of the problem…it would be the first step in trying to fix it.
Last edited: