BhagatSingh
SPNer
- Apr 24, 2006
- 2,921
- 1,656
Maybe its beacuse Amarsanghra ji came after a while and has a much more clearer view of the situation.
I myself have experienced that.
I myself have experienced that.
pk70 ji
sadly it did not seem clear to me.
I think Bhagat asked the question very objectively and clearly.
The answer was not clear and objective, but deductive and based on own perception of other person's posts and intentions.
might be my shortcoming in grasping the language or anything.
apologies anyways !
As I read Aman ji’s post, it reflects the history of Bhagat Singh’s behavior towards Gurbani and Hair etc, I don’t know if you know, Bhagat Singh Ji was warned because of this very reason and he admits if he does go of the topic.
This is untrue but I understand that it might not change the point of the rest of your post.
Tough questions are often mistaken as insult and they should not be.
this is exactly why i rephrased Bhagat's question.
breaking away from my vow of single liners
elementary Singh ji
the answer is 2
but if i had some self interest, i will make it whatever you want to hear.:u):
Read the last line carefully
However,
i feel we have the two questions set by Bhagat:
Anyone open to discussion?
Ignoring what I have written above and below the actual content... read on!
Aad ji, You mentioned in another part of the forum that one of the rules is to not "Undermine Sikhism".
I wanted to ask and thought this would be the perfect place to do so.
How would one go about "undermining Sikhism"?
By Sikhism if one means the organized Religion including the rehit and Dasam Granth, then I believe I have already done that along with many other members on the forum.
By Sikhism, if one means the teachings of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, then how do you undermine them???
I need clarification on this, and perhaps others do as well.
Thanks
Bhagat
NO sir. Dasam Granth and Rehit + SGGS is DIFFERENT from SGGS.Let me give you an example I have made up:
Same question different way
1) I believe Guru Gobind Singh ji was stupid for fighting. He should have pursued non violence. Why didn't he?
same question rephrased
2) Why did Guru Gobind Singh ji take up the sword and pursue a path of non violence instead?
see what I am getting at.