- Jul 20, 2012
- 1,393
- 1,921
Actually it IS semantics... and pls note I didnt say 'please' everyone. I said see / serve the divine light in everyone. Pleasing them or God didn't come into it. As I said, God is ONEness and everything is a part of that one. So there really is no 'pleasing' in that scenario! It's more 'realizing'.
When Christians say they see personality of God in someone they don't literally mean God is part of them. They mean someone is acting as God would have them act (as dictated by the Bible) in a Godly manner... but they very much see God as entirely separate from Creation. Sikhi however tells us God is WITHIN everything - but also exists independently of everything in *it/he/she*'s on right (use whatever you want there because God has no gender and is formless). All this form, us, the planets sun etc are ALL illusion and temporary. However, the 'seer' behind every set of eyes is one and the same. THAT'S what we need to recognize in each other. Not to PLEASE anyonee, but for our own realization and other's realization so that someday we might experience that ONEness
When Christians say they see personality of God in someone they don't literally mean God is part of them. They mean someone is acting as God would have them act (as dictated by the Bible) in a Godly manner... but they very much see God as entirely separate from Creation. Sikhi however tells us God is WITHIN everything - but also exists independently of everything in *it/he/she*'s on right (use whatever you want there because God has no gender and is formless). All this form, us, the planets sun etc are ALL illusion and temporary. However, the 'seer' behind every set of eyes is one and the same. THAT'S what we need to recognize in each other. Not to PLEASE anyonee, but for our own realization and other's realization so that someday we might experience that ONEness