BhagatSingh
SPNer
- Apr 24, 2006
- 2,921
- 1,656
BIttu Ji,
In Sikhism, God creates the cosmos by his Word. He sets them in motion then watches over them. Sikhs might run into some problems with things like vestigial traits and laryngeal detours, etc but the creation story of Sikhs leaves enough room for Evolution. In fact, some verses can be interpreted to resemble Evolution e.g.
Actually, to be honest, even the Bible creation story is often interpreted symbolically. When that is done, evolution fits in. If you choose to tale it literally in the face of all the evidence against it then you are just rejecting reality, IMO.
I think there is one last thing I can do for you. I can show you how you are making logical fallacies with your "Evolution is false so creationism must be true" argument.
You are setting up a false dichotomy. Its not evolution vs Creationism but Evolution vs No Evolution. Evolution vs (Biblical) Creationism is a false dichotomy because there are an infinite number of other possibilities. If its not the Biblical creationism then some Hindu creation myth or Pagan myth or whatever else our minds can conjure up.
If evolution is shown to be false then that's that, its false. You cannot say Creationism is true because Evolution is false. You still have all your work laid out ahead of you to show that Biblical Creationism is be true, as Bib. Creationism vs No Bib. Creationism is the correct dichotomy.
If Biblical Creationism turns out to be false that doesn't automatically make the Hindu Creation stories true. Again that would be setting up a false dichotomy of Bib. Creation vs Hindu Creation. etc
The following video shows the fallacies in the most prominent creationists' arguments, and of course, some of the things you have said fit right in.
YouTube- Top 25 Creationist Fallacies
BTW I was a creationist before I studied science.
Enjoy the videos, Goodbye!
In Sikhism, God creates the cosmos by his Word. He sets them in motion then watches over them. Sikhs might run into some problems with things like vestigial traits and laryngeal detours, etc but the creation story of Sikhs leaves enough room for Evolution. In fact, some verses can be interpreted to resemble Evolution e.g.
The three worlds could mean life on land, water and air. So based on this interpretation, some might argue that Sikhism supports Evolution.ਸਾਚੇ ਤੇ ਪਵਨਾ ਭਇਆ ਪਵਨੈ ਤੇ ਜਲੁ ਹੋਇ ॥
साचे ते पवना भइआ पवनै ते जलु होइ ॥
Sācẖe ṯe pavnā bẖa▫i▫ā pavnai ṯe jal ho▫e.
From the True Lord came the air, and from the air came water.
ਜਲ ਤੇ ਤ੍ਰਿਭਵਣੁ ਸਾਜਿਆ ਘਟਿ ਘਟਿ ਜੋਤਿ ਸਮੋਇ ॥
जल ते त्रिभवणु साजिआ घटि घटि जोति समोइ ॥
Jal ṯe ṯaribẖavaṇ sāji▫ā gẖat gẖat joṯ samo▫e.
From water, He created the three worlds; in each and every heart He has infused His Light.
pg 19 < link to the whole passage
Actually, to be honest, even the Bible creation story is often interpreted symbolically. When that is done, evolution fits in. If you choose to tale it literally in the face of all the evidence against it then you are just rejecting reality, IMO.
I think there is one last thing I can do for you. I can show you how you are making logical fallacies with your "Evolution is false so creationism must be true" argument.
You are setting up a false dichotomy. Its not evolution vs Creationism but Evolution vs No Evolution. Evolution vs (Biblical) Creationism is a false dichotomy because there are an infinite number of other possibilities. If its not the Biblical creationism then some Hindu creation myth or Pagan myth or whatever else our minds can conjure up.
If evolution is shown to be false then that's that, its false. You cannot say Creationism is true because Evolution is false. You still have all your work laid out ahead of you to show that Biblical Creationism is be true, as Bib. Creationism vs No Bib. Creationism is the correct dichotomy.
If Biblical Creationism turns out to be false that doesn't automatically make the Hindu Creation stories true. Again that would be setting up a false dichotomy of Bib. Creation vs Hindu Creation. etc
The following video shows the fallacies in the most prominent creationists' arguments, and of course, some of the things you have said fit right in.
YouTube- Top 25 Creationist Fallacies
BTW I was a creationist before I studied science.
Enjoy the videos, Goodbye!