Gurfateh
Wow! Excellent job my friend in putting down the hard work of Giani Gurdit Singh ji. How much do you know of the work of Giani Gurdit Singh ji? As far as I know, he had been researching this topic for almost 50 years. His book Mundavani has many proofs of what he researched and is the final product of decades of research that he did.
Moreover, just by visiting any place will you come know all he facts about that place? Certainly not!. You will have to put years and years of your life to research with an open mind and not with a closed mind full of superstition.
With this thinking I won't be surprised if you say in future that the work of Dr. Ganda Singh ji, Kahan Singh Nabha et all was also of no use since they did not visit all the places.
Please take some rest between the readings from various sources that you do, this will help you contemplate.
Good wishes,
-Akashdeep
Dear Brother,
If we lack faith in God we have fear and due to fear we do good lots of lies.
Say if Adolf Hitler did years of reseach on fake things then it may not mean that Years were truly utilised.We have Dr Jakir Nayak who does research a lies so that is not eh point.
Well coming to Gyan Gurdit Singh Ji,
Reason for Tankha for him is this lie.He has never seen the manuscripts of Guru Granth Sahib Ji at Patna Sahib.We both can revisit Patna Sahib and reconfirm it.As he says there is not manuscript in Patna Sahib without Raagmala.So it is up to you to still belive in lies.
There is thread over Mundvini here also.As you talk of Bhai Kahan Singh Ji Nabha.He said that at Kartarpuri Berrh(primary version) there are interpoltated verses like Jit Dar Lakh Mohamada etc. and Raagmala is there.
But Bhai Jodh Singh himslef carried research on intance of Panthic boides and found that Bhai Kahan Singh Nabha also lied as there is no such verse like Jit Dar Lakh mohamada etc. in
Kartarpuri Beerh.In the same copy only after 1 and half page from Mundavini Raagmala is wrritan and before that also there are mnay pages which had blank pages.Raagmala in same and ink and hand writing is found on perhaps 975 Page(das could be mistaken).
Das was told that Bhai Sahib Kahan Singh Ji were shown another version by Sodi Family.while they say that they have oonly one version of the copy.There seems to be no motive either for Sodis to show wrong thing.
And in fact withiin this Beerh on some empty page some one has wrritan a formula of alchemy but in differnt writing and ink.Had sodis fabricated something then they would not have shown this alchemy formula also.
And thing does not ends here.As per Dr Sengar(Hindi Litrature Historian) Alam was at the time of Bahadur Shah(contmeporary of Guru Gobind Singh Ji).So how could Alam went in past to write Raagmala as it is also found in Bhai Bannu Beerh(can be seen at Kanpur Gurudwara Bhai Bannu).
And the oldest version of Madhav Nal Kam Kandala from wherre people claim that Raagmal is taken can be seen at Kankroli in UP and it is called Kankroli Manuscript.There are 20% differance and if we say we do tranlitration from Nagri to Gurmukhi differance can go upto 80% but wants to neutral over here that as writan in Gurumukhi same sounds may have diffenr Chaercter to depict.So das still say 80% similar.Yet Its time is about that of Guru Gobind Singh Ji.Last winter das spent a great lot of time to research and das put that thing over here on this site also with scaaned file and tranlitration from Nagri to Roman.
Still if you say Gyani Gurdit Singh ji are OK then das has no objection.Das say as a Sikh that Akal can get anyone salvage and that one also who does not read Raagmala.Anyway another school of people say that there was another Alam who was Sufi, and he was at the time of Akbar.Yet there is no prrof of that then single description of Akabar's time in Madhav Nal Kamkandala.There are mnay more works on same stroy and there is perhaps Triya Charitar 91 which has stroy of Madhavnal Kamkandala.
Reson for single Alam describing the time of Akbar could be more due to his being poet and Akbar period was golden era and his time we had Aurangzeb who made hell for litrary people.
Das wants to say that Das started from the fact that Raagmala is from Alam the First and when moved backword found this not true.
If say youself have not visited Thamu Ji Sahib Kartarpur and not seen the Beerh which they show on Vaishakhi,Yuo may use other sourses to say aboput that.They can be wrong.So do ti yourself.Now as you say Gyani Gurdit Singh ji worked,it is not your first Hand info.Das request you to collect primary data then relying upon secondary data which could be biased.