Above are some of the writing from charitro pahkyian...doing the same..having agreed that these are stories he then asks that no one should beleive such without any evidence of his own.
"Further, am a very common Sikh & one thing is sure that i believe DG is the creation of Dasam Pita Ji & atleast am nvr gonna show my back to my father .... like so called Kala Afghana, Prof Darshan Singh Ji Khalsa & their followers doing these days ..."<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Itsmaneet Ji, You have not given any iota of evidence that it is indeed wholly writen by what you call "your father".Is that why you hoping that others will follow you and beleive the same?
You have been on about charitro pakhian and its contents;perhaps you find it interesting and may also read it in the presence of your daughters, parents and females; like one can comfortably read the Gurbani of Guru Granth sahib.
Will you?Also can you tell me with precise evidence to who exactly wrote these charitr pakhiyaan.We have all heard the allegations abt the author...but it certainly is NOT Guru Gobind Singh ji.So how does that make your pita's writings?
While there is an abundance of evidence and even the scholars of the panth have factually established and agreed that NOT the whole dasam granth is of Guru Gobind Singh's bani, here is YOU that comes along and claims "i believe DG is the creation of Dasam Pita Ji & at least am nvr gonna show my back to my father"
But all that without offering any shred of evidence!!NOt a single iota of reference has been provided by to say this why you believe so.
To me you very much sound like those paracharaks who invent mythological stories as they go along and make it sound interesting>And it is Thanks to such story telling that there is so much confusion amongst Sikhs over these tales that are in the dasam granth!
And you expect me to believe you , just because you say so?
Let me tell you it is such story tellers who had been listening to Prof Darshan Singh Ji ,Kala afghana etc Singh,for years without quiblling... etc ; and then suddenly over night these same people[darshan singh etc] are accused of being anti panth; with the story tellers telling crooked stories turned them into so called demons.But people out there are not so foolish to believe such crooked stories.It is very apparent a bunch of fools do not want people who can rationalise to compete with their nonsense.
There is a saying if one tells lies long enough,one will start beleiving their own lies.I see that all the time with forensic mentally deranged and delusional crooks or people with personality disorders.So much so, they loose track of the reallity they have told along the line.
It is on record that the dasam granth has been diluted.For your information only yesterday I was at the British National Library [after going through the Olympic village] and went through the dasam granth for about 4 hours
Notes made by previous scholars who have researched it from 1901 all say it has been diluted.More than often even the authors of such stories in the DG are unknown.Period.
Scholars likeBhai Kahn Singh Nabha, Giani Lal singh [all had their vidya from snatan brahman orientated system]etc are of the opinion that there is certainly dilution and not the whole of dg is of Guru Gobind Singh ji.I have researched on it and in my article I have clearly stated the contents that relates to Gurbani is only 7% and no more.The rest totally contradicts the values and priciples of the Gurus and their teachings.
It is another story that the sadh sant snatan lobby being strong enough managed to get the issue shelved.But there is NO disagreement in the Panth that the whole dasam granth is not wholly the bani of Guru Gobind Singh Ji, and here you come along without any evidnce declare
"i believe DG is the creation of Dasam Pita Ji & at least am nvr gonna show my back to my father"
I find that quite amusing as an unacademic claim, and nothing more than the sadh that waffles off tales that nobody else has often heard about!
For your information, I have read the dasam granth 12 times, 7 in Punjabi and five in English.
Farsi is a language that I have learnt to speak, reasonably too along with others.There is no rockets science about braj bhasha, current day bhojpuri is near enough!
There is absolutely nothing wrong in reading any amount of literature, but what the problem is when attempts are made to declare it Guru --like it has been done in the recent past where the word Guru has been printed upon it by vested interests who wish to dilute the heritage and identity of the sikhs.Because dasam granth contains more grandmother tales and hindu kaam shashtra and vidya like to how to over come or increase sexual prowess, powers have realised it is easy to mislead the sikhs.The sadh lobby too recognises that as long they keep sikhs are interested in the tales, their own KURSI is safe;....in fact the non discussion order by the panth has created an atmosphere that encourages this negative on going controversy...as the lsser people know the truth, the easier for them to continue their stories and claims and keep people memerised.
The DG is not comparable to the Guru Granth sahib;neither is it the guardian of MIRI or whatever as opposed to Guru Granth sahib.
:blueturban::interestedsingh:
:happysingh::redturban:0
:sippingcoffeemunda:japposatnamwaheguru:
