- May 9, 2006
- 3,261
- 5,192
It doesn't theologically, but do ontologically, that is, ACT n BEING of GOD respectively.
What does this actually mean? You lose me with your sesquipedalianism.
It doesn't theologically, but do ontologically, that is, ACT n BEING of GOD respectively.
God doesn't take birth in anyone.
Are you genuinely here for clarifications or interrogations ? Seems rather odd, coz, what ought to serve number of conducive purposes as an interfaith-dialogue systems in achieving community ethos is beginning to look more like a fishing expedition with an ulterior motive. The interfaith value of SGGSJ is central in uniting humankind and yet, here you are with a personal agenda ripping it apart. I think we should all revisit and remind ourselves of the obligations to further religious pluralism and bring about harmony in the strife-torn world than to nit-pick ideological and theological concepts of our respective faiths.
..hence, faith, which constitutes belief and that in turn is classified as religion [dharm], become a Sikh [student] therefore, all will be revealed through the "word" [shabd]. Pls don't take it the wrong way for the house of Nanak sees all as "one", doesn't matter whether you're a Christain, Muslem or other, all creation is the product of the one - gloss it up how you like. Besides, the spiritual base of all different faiths speaks of the one as, word, logos, holy ghost, spirit [Christainity], akash bani, ram nam, ram dhun [Hinduism], kalma'n, banga 'ul ismani [Islam], dhur ki bani, anhad shabd [Sikh] and nirvana [Buddhaism]. Why don't you look within Quran Sharif Sahib for clarifications and understanding and then perhaps share it with us rather than unnecessarily going over to the neighbouring land when the same crop can be harvested at home.Clarifications may not be achieved without asking questions and testing our understanding.
...you're welcome, but it does get boring coz it's one's personal belief and really, hasn't an objective testing.This may appear as interrogations
..I'm afraid my Guru has spared me all the running around for Allah the wonderful, benevloent, merciful is enshrined within SGGSJ, but thanks all the same. Our Guru's went through all the tests of time and handed down to us a system, an eithical system known as the three pillars, that is, Vand Shuk [share], Kirit Kar [industrious disposition] and Nam Jap [remembrance of Allah].You are free to interrogate me, for a man of faith should be prepared to go through a bit of tests in his life.
The word fear is not in the Sikh's vocab, history stands testamont, if anything, it is the fear of doing wrong to another.If you are upon the true guidance of the Gurus, then you need not fear.
...and, what would that be ?If there is any agenda, that will perhaps be,
...our Lord is one, see above !to please the Lord we are supposed to believe in.
...and, that would mean, the lions with their own lion god, the monkeys their monkey god, and the rest of creation likewise would to their only perception/conception would worship their own God, naturally. Similarily the case, with the differences races of man, each like the lions n the monkeys would want to advance their very own for why another with which they cannot identify [culture, environment and biological]The unity of mankind could be achieved if they agree on worshipping the true God,
The unity of mankind could be achieved if they agree on worshipping the true God
..,.sorry, I continue on from post #46...what I wanted to say was, can true God be found outside in images and artifacts, for if that'd be the case then the Lions will claim their's to be the true God and the Monkeys theirs, where will it end? Answer is NO ! Divine Reality is transcendental full stop. What Guru Nanak did, he conceptualised Sargun [subjective, with attributes] and Nirgun [objective, without attributes] taking into account humanistic level and spiritual level link road for the separated soul [subjective part of the objective being] to be able to return and become whole. The Guru in form [Nanak for example] is fundamental and primary because it is through the form will one culminate into the formlessness [chautha pad, 4th state of consciousness]. That is to say, the ideology is, if the form is found to be beautiful, majestic, kind, virtuous, great, wonderful, generous, magiucal and the rest, than what of the hand that has created such a form, surely, ineffable. Modern Sikhism does not believe per se in "worshipping", but in performance virtues and moral virtues, that is, grit, self-control, resilience and honesty, compassion and respect, respectively, which are vital for society to thrive.The unity of mankind could be achieved if they agree on worshipping the true God, not through worshipping His incarnations,
Absolutely ! Yes, the Gurus are the "conductors" through which flows the "energy" and it is energy [shabd] within which is Guru. It is not the copper pipes that makes the radiators hot but the water flowing through them and likewise the jewellery box isn't of any value but the jewels inside the box. And, similarily, Nanak and the Guru's were connecting masses not with their physical bodies but with their inner "nam" substance.Does not SGGS insist that true guidance can only be found through the Gurus?
My apologies for disagreeing. SGGS states otherwise:
The Self-existent, Perfect Primal Lord God Creator has taken birth. First, Guru Nanak, then Guru Angad and Guru Amar Daas, the True Guru, have been absorbed into the Word of the Shabad. (SGGS p1407)
What does this actually mean? You lose me with your sesquipedalianism.
Modern Sikhism does not believe per se in "worshipping", but in performance virtues and moral virtues, that is, grit, self-control, resilience and honesty, compassion and respect, respectively, which are vital for society to thrive.
What kind of birth are you thinking?...could it be birth of 'your true self'...birth of higher consciousness...birth of inner sight....birth of awareness...birth of awakening...birth of light of God (ocean) into waves (gurus)...a person blind to the existence of God within them...then all of a sudden the experience of God takes place...a new person is born...a person who now know the truth...who now lives knowing this truth...
I don't believe God takes birth in anything or anyone in any form whatsoever. This is a wrong concept of God and downdrades Him - perhaps the very opposite of what one may intend. I understand, this is what you believe eventhough SGGS forbids that or a form of it in another place (please see page 1136. Pasting a whole page as may be required will take too much space) - thus contradictory in my humble opinion.
Moreover, I disagree with such notion on the rational basis too (I know a Sikhi is not supposed to be a rational being).
It is my understanding on the basis of a statement from Guru Nanak ji that intellect is a drunken elephant and produces utter lies (please see page 351 of SGGS). I am (kind of ) using a Harvard system of referencing.
I don't believe God takes birth in anything or anyone in any form whatsoever.
This is a wrong concept of God and downdrades Him - perhaps the very opposite of what one may intend
Please explain your rationalityMoreover, I disagree with such notion on the rational basis too
Is your rationality finding one liners to support your argument?It is my understanding on the basis of a statement from Guru Nanak ji that intellect is a drunken elephant and produces utter lies (please see page 351 of SGGS). I am (kind of ) using a Harvard system of referencing.
I don't intend to disrespect your beliefs or Gurus. Peace!
The unity of mankind could be achieved if they agree on worshipping the true God, not through worshipping His incarnations, for which different people have their own versions - each conflicting with other. Does not SGGS insist that true guidance can only be found through the Gurus?
You do not however have the right to carte blanche know what is and what is not a wrong concept of God and impose it on another, if you are talking about Allah, then the best place to debate that would probably not be a Sikh forum. If in Islam God is in heaven, and in Sikhism, God is everywhere, is there any point in any debate on the matter?
People differ in various aspects of life, be it religious or other. Husbands and wives differ almost everyday. I make comments based on my understandings and beliefs and by reading certain texts. I do so, not just on religious affairs, but others too. I don't have any power to impose anything on others, even to my own family. Of course, you are free to lead your life as you please. This is the 'Interfaith' section of the forums, hence I get the impression that my comments will be accommodated. If you are the owner of the forums, you can exercise your right to exclude me. I don't get paid by any human being for what I do. In my personal life, I hardly take any orders from other human beings as I am self-employed.
Peace!