aad ji,
sure why not. Please do that.
I posted it just for information purposes..as this Thread is read by many visitors.
sure why not. Please do that.
I posted it just for information purposes..as this Thread is read by many visitors.
WRONG.
That is your view and a Vashnavite view. Not the Sikh view. Read
http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/sikh-sikhi-sikhism/8828-fools-who-wrangle-over-flesh.html
Many do and many can. It is not for you to dictate how where and when Bani is read.
Sadana was a butcher yet his Bani is included in the Guru Granth Sahib ji. Maybe that should be excluded according to your view.
Your point is?
Pure but not in the Brahmanical sense as you imply here:
Page 1289 Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji
mehlaa 1.
maas maas kar moorakh jhagrhay gi-aan Dhi-aan nahee jaanai.
ka-un maas ka-un saag kahaavai kis meh paap samaanay.
gaiNdaa maar hom jag kee-ay dayviti-aa kee baanay.
maas chhod bais nak pakrheh raatee maanas khaanay.
farh kar lokaaN no dikhlaavahi gi-aan Dhi-aan nahee soojhai.
naanak anDhay si-o ki-aa kahee-ai kahai na kahi-aa boojhai.
anDhaa so-ay je anDh kamaavai tis ridai se lochan naahee.
maat pitaa kee rakat nipannay machhee maas na khaaNhee.
First Mehl:
The fools argue about flesh and meat, but they know nothing about meditation and spiritual wisdom.
What is called meat, and what is called green vegetables? What leads to sin?
It was the habit of the gods to kill the rhinoceros, and make a feast of the burnt offering.
Those who renounce meat, and hold their noses when sitting near it, devour men at night.
They practice hypocrisy, and make a show before other people, but they do not understand anything about meditation or spiritual wisdom.
O Nanak, what can be said to the blind people? They cannot answer, or even understand what is said.
They alone are blind, who act blindly. They have no eyes in their hearts.
They are produced from the blood of their mothers and fathers, but they do not eat fish or meat.
Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji
Any further comment on the Pro's and Con's of meat eating should be confined to the above thread. They will be deleted from any other thread.
Thanks for sharing this.
Interestingly Muslims say theirs is the way that is most humane of slaughtering.
The Sikh thought on this is not about cruelty, because if you think about it “humane slaughtering” is a bit of an oxy{censored}.
What the Guru’s said was, look what is the point of, “ritual slaughter”?
Is it going to purify it?
If you are saying you are purifying it, then for what purpose?
How can a man purify that which is created by God?
Ritual slaughter would include Halal, Kosher and even Hindu Bali (which is Jhatka).
So it is not the method of slaughter which is being criticised, but the ritual itself. The Guru’s criticised Anustrani, where an animal (and vegetable food), wood be dispatched with the cremated body to help appease the dead person ancestors. A meaningless ritual, for the Guru’s.
It is important to remember that the Guru’s are not criticising just Halal, but the word being used is “Kuttha” pronounced “Katthaa” which criticises ALL ritual slaughter, but does not criticise meat eating per se.
This point is one that many people miss in their eagerness to prove a point one way in another.
The Guru’s were no fools, they chose the specific word of “Kuttha” as shown here Page 472:
mehlaa 1.
maanas khaanay karahi nivaaj.
chhuree vagaa-in tin gal taag.
tin ghar barahman pooreh naad.
unHaa bhe aavahi o-ee saad.
koorhee raas koorhaa vaapaar.
koorh bol karahi aahaar.
saram Dharam kaa dayraa door.
naanak koorh rahi-aa bharpoor.
mathai tikaa tayrh Dhotee kakhaa-ee.
hath chhuree jagat kaasaa-ee.
neel vastar pahir hoveh parvaan.
malaychh Dhaan lay poojeh puraan.
abhaakhi-aa kaa kuthaa bakraa khaanaa.
cha-ukay upar kisai na jaanaa.
day kai cha-ukaa kadhee kaar.
upar aa-ay baithay koorhi-aar.
mat bhitai vay mat bhitai.
ih ann asaadaa fitai.
tan fitai fayrh karayn.
man joothai chulee bharayn.
kaho naanak sach Dhi-aa-ee-ai.
such hovai taa sach paa-ee-ai.
First Mehl:
The man-eaters say their prayers.
Those who wield the knife wear the sacred thread around their necks.
In their homes, the Brahmins sound the conch.
They too have the same taste.
False is their capital, and false is their trade.
Speaking falsehood, they take their food.
The home of modesty and Dharma is far from them.
O Nanak, they are totally permeated with falsehood. The sacred marks are on their foreheads, and the saffron loin-cloths are around their waists;
in their hands they hold the knives - they are the butchers of the world!
Wearing blue robes, they seek the approval of the Muslim rulers.
Accepting bread from the Muslim rulers, they still worship the Puraanas.
They eat the meat of the goats, killed after the Muslim prayers are read over them,
but they do not allow anyone else to enter their kitchen areas.
They draw lines around them, plastering the ground with cow-dung.
The false come and sit within them.
They cry out, "Do not touch our food,
this food of ours will be polluted!
But with their polluted bodies, they commit evil deeds.
With filthy minds, they try to cleanse their mouths.
Says Nanak, meditate on the True Lord.
If you are pure, you will obtain the True Lord.
Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji
The key to this is Ritual, Ritual purification, Ritual Slaughter (done under the guise of prayers, be it Muslim or otherwise).
Randip Singh Ji,
Sat sri Akal.
I have written in the starting of my reply "according to my point of view".
Obviously, everyone has their own point of view about different issues.
I think, you have much deeper understanding of gurbani. May be I do not have.
It is true that I am vegetarian and Sikh girl. Not Brahmin. I am proud to be a sikh.
Please explain to me the meaning of the following lines from Jap ji sahib...
"Asankh gal vadd hatteya kamaei".
Actually I think hatteya is killing of others (human or animal).
And at the end of pauri Guru ji says,
"Jo tud bhave saai bhali kar"
Whatever you(God) like, that is good.
May be I am wrong here also.
We can recite gurbani and be vegetarians only with Vaheguru blessings. I feel myself very lucky to be vegetarian because my soul do not allow me to eat egg and flesh.
Sadana was a butcher yet his Bani is included in the Guru Granth Sahib ji. Maybe that should be excluded according to your view.
I am nothing to say baani of someone should be excluded from Guru granth Sahib ji. Are you sure he ate meat?
Why our foundation is on Daya? Is khalsa is only for poor human beings not for poor animals like goat? According to my understanding we should not kill anybody (human or animal) who is not harmfull for us. But should speak against killers of innocents ( Delhi, 1984).
Sat sri Akal Randip Singh Ji,
Can you please suggest any site for sakhi of Sadana ji.
I read from some sites, it is written there that he was Butcher by his profession and he was thinking that his profession was according to God will.
But when he decided to meet God he left. And at one site it was written that when he went to kill goat, goat laughed at him and he couldn't kill him. Is this really true?
And we have bani of sufi muslim saints. I think they all follow daya not as rituel but as their soul was not allowing them. But other muslims eat halal. What is your point here that Sadna belongs to a butcher caste???? Did he eat meat then what about Muslim saints? Were they against our Guru's?
I am very younger than you in age and in thoughts.
Regards,
Har.
Randip ji
Doesn't this shabad take us back to the core of the argument about "eating meat." The shabad is the explanation of the problem -- which has nothing to do with eating meat. The problem, that has confused people for a few centuries, has to do with overweening pride and self importance in the absence of empathy for one's fellow humans. The connections that are made between tuks here and words there and the forbidding of meat are far-fetched and outlandish but the music continues. Thanks for the shabad.
The very first comment by Randip Ji is very educational, even to me as I was once a fool who wrangled over flesh.. For me, the reason behind my "wrangling" was definitely a lack of knowledge, so when I sought supposedly factual answers from others, even they had a lack of knowledge caused by misinterpretation (to the exact quotes of bani n the first comment). This had been passed on and on by others, and so had eventually become a false fact.. It's just one or few persons "opinion" which becomes developed as a false fact and goes around through hearsay..
Even though, I've only learned today what the real explanations are, I've never used any quotes for evidence as to whether meat should be eaten or not.. Because later, I had discovered (as I'm sure I've mentioned before) the answers in Guru Granth Sahib Ji aren't simple, aren't black and white - if people have a lack of knowledge of Gurbani to begin with.. And that's how such misinterpretation through hearsay spreads..
Also, I'm not sure whether this has been mentioned, but I do know of another aspect which people misinterpret; an event where Guru Gobind Singh Ji used to go hunting.. I can only remember one incident when Guru Ji spotted a rabbit and instantly killed it. People tend to just think that's all there is to it, that Guru Ji's killed animals themselves and ate their meat. But with the incident of the rabbit, I remember that the soul in the rabbit was a man who had betrayed Guru Nanak Dev Ji in the earlier years. He used to do seva with Guru Nanak Dev Ji when they'd just met, much to his wife's dismay because Guru Ji and the man would go and do seva for years on, which the wife didn't like. I think she tried to stop him from going but he still wanted to but then she convinced him and then when Guru Ji came to his house to get him, his wife told him to hide in the back (where unkowingly a snake was present) and the wife told Guru Ji that he had gone.. During their conversation where the wife had lied to Guru Ji and the man was in the back, the snake had fatally bit him and I think he died. The wife suddenly knew why that'd happened and begged Guru Ji to forgive him and Guru Ji said he had to learn his mistake but he will come in his tenth form (as Guru Gobind Singh Ji) and will give him peace.
So the soul in the rabbit was that same man which betrayed Guru Nanak Dev Ji and so like He had said, this is why Guru Gobind Singh Ji killed the rabbit instantly to release his soul..
Oh and I've just found a site stating how people misinterpret Guru Ji's hunting and the fourth incident on there is the short yet more precise version of what I've just explained above..
http://www.panthkhalsa.org/rahit/rahit_hunt.php
panthkhalsa.org is a biased site. They are fanatically anti-meat and are run by the AKJ.
This rabbit story would imply that the Guru's were vengeful too, i.e. they took people lives for betraying them? I say NEVER!
AKJ (and other sects) always have to make spurious reasons up, when the obvious is staring them in the face.:whisling:
In any case who is to say that a person who is killing animal for food is not releasing the soul for a better life? This way at least the flesh is not wasted.
Guruji and his Sikhs killed these animals for the following reason:
1) Fierce animals that terrorised locals
2) Food
3) Train his Sikhs (hunting was used as a sport to train warriors)
Randip Ji
I didn't know that, but I heard that story first off my brother, so then I tried to find a website stating that incident.
Randip Ji, I too say never. I didn't say or mean to portray that Guru Ji's were vengeful, as when I said the snake had bit the man, I didn't mean that Guru Ji ordered the snake to kill him or wanted to kill him. I thought it was more of.. God's will, let's say? So therefore, I agree that Guru Ji's didn't cause the death of the man, I'm merely pointing out that he had betaryed Guru Ji and the man had died.. I'm saying that was meant to happen, not that Guru Ji's killed people who betrayed them ect because what sort of Guru would encourage that behaviour for the future people; the future Sikhs.. Of course not our Gurus..
Apologies but I'm getting a bit confused here.. Before I continue, you're saying that you don't believe in this 'releasing of souls' so does that mean this rabbit incident is not true or it isn't true in relation to the fact that Guru Gobind Singh Ji killed the rabbit to release it's soul?
I agree with you, however, (and this is just a thought) isn't it wrong for people to kill an animal to 'release' it's soul for a better life, as that'd mean they are interfering in God's will - because it's upto God to reincarnate a person as something (be it animal or human) depending on what good or bad deeds the person had done before he died?
I understand points 1 and 3 but point 2 means Guru Ji's ate the meat then? (I'm just enquiring.. I don't really read sites (apart from the one I included because it related to what I was saying) because I already made my decision based on my opinion of how I feel about this topic, a long time ago).
I agree, thank you for that, Randip Ji. By the way, so would you say books are more reliable than internet sites (which I find hard to figure out whether they are biased towards one view or not)?
And I strongly agree with all your points but mostly point 3 as, Guru Ji's were there to be our role model, our teacher, so it is important that we concentrate on their deeds and actions and try to follow those in our own lives.
In Sikhism, only vegetarian food is served in the Gurdwara, but Sikhs are not totally bound to be meat-free. The general consensus is that Sikhs are free to choose whether to adopt the vegetarian or meat diet,[1] although once baptized by taking Amrit, some minority sects of Sikhs (Damdami Taksal, Akhand Kirtani Jatha, Namdharis, Guru Nanak Nishkam Sewak Jatha[2] and the 3HO[3]), believe that a Sikh should be meat free,[4] however this is not a Universally held belief amongst Sikhs. Orthodox Sikhs[5] believe that once Amrit is taken, Sikh's are only prohibited from eating Kuttha or ritually slaughtered (Halal, Kosher) meat.
Sri Guru Granth Sahib, the holiest book talks about vegetarianism and spirituality in the following couplet:
— First Mehl:Page 1289 [6][7] Sri Guru Granth Sahib On the views that eating meat would be eating flesh, first Sikh Guru Nanak states:
The fools argue about flesh and meat, but they know nothing about meditation and spiritual wisdom.
What is called meat, and what is called green vegetables? What leads to sin?
It was the habit of the gods to kill the rhinoceros, and make a feast of the burnt offering.
Those who renounce meat, and hold their noses when sitting near it, devour men at night.
They practice hypocrisy, and make a show before other people, but they do not understand anything about meditation or spiritual wisdom.
O Nanak, what can be said to the blind people? They cannot answer, or even understand what is said.
They alone are blind, who act blindly. They have no eyes in their hearts.
They are produced from the blood of their mothers and fathers, but they do not eat fish or meat.
AGGS, M 1, p 1290.[8]Sikhism is a liberal, tolerant faith that acknowledges personal liberty and the crucial proponent of human nature, free will.[9] As such, Sikh philosophy and Scriptures are not didactic in nature, for Sikhism offers spiritual, ethical and moral guidance to a fulfilling way of life rather than a tightly-construed and strict religious discipline. As a result, it is the subject of much debate as to whether Sikhs are prohibited by the Sikh Code of Conduct, the Rehat Maryada, from eating meat. The consensus is however, Sikhs are bound to avoid meat that is killed in a ritualistic manner[10] e.g. Halal, Kosher etc.[11][12]
— First Mehl:
ਪਾਂਡੇ ਤੂ ਜਾਣੈ ਹੀ ਨਾਹੀ ਕਿਥਹੁ ਮਾਸੁ ਉਪੰਨਾ ॥ ਤੋਇਅਹੁ ਅੰਨੁ ਕਮਾਦੁ ਕਪਾਹਾਂ ਤੋਇਅਹੁ ਤ੍ਰਿਭਵਣੁ ਗੰਨਾ ॥
O Pandit, you do not know where did flesh originate! It is water where life originated and it is water that sustains all life. It is water that produces grains, sugarcane, cotton and all forms of life.
Within the Gurdwara, the Guru ka Langar (Guru's community kitchen) serves purely vegetarian food, freshly prepared from all natural ingredients for all people, at all times. The reason for serving vegetarian food is that the Langar is open to all. Since many faiths and people have varying taboos on what to eat and how meat should be prepared etc, and since Sikhs accept these restrictions and accommodate people no matter their faith or culture, the safest option thought by the Sikh Gurus was to adopt vegetarian food for Langar. The exception to vegetarian langar is when Nihangs, ( a minor but oldest Sikh sect in India) serve meat[13] on the occasion of Holla Mohalla, and call it MahaPrashad .
Sikhism argues that the soul can possibly undergo millions of transformations as various forms of life before ultimately becoming human. These life forms could be a rock, vegetation or animal. Sikhism does not see a difference between mineral, vegetation and animal. The only distinction made is that between these (mineral, vegetation and animal), and human. [14]
The first Sikh Guru Nanak Dev said it was a pointless argument to debate the merits of either not eating or eating meat in the context of religion, as maintaining a strict diet does not make one blessed or elevate one to a superior status, spiritually or otherwise, over another. Being a member of a religion incorporates not merely one's dietary customs but the entire way in which they govern their lifestyle.[15] He advocated a lifestyle consisting of honest, hard work and humility Kirat Karni, focus and remembrance of God Naam Japna and compassion for all of humanity and God's creation all around Vaṇḍ chakkō, with these 3 key principles taking far greater precedence over one's mere dietary habits.
Contents
[hide]
- 1 Sikh Intellectual Views on Vegetarianism and Sikhism
- 2 The Sikh Code of Conduct on the Vegetarian Issue
- 3 Historical dietary behaviour of Sikhs
- 4 See also
- 5 References
[edit] Sikh Intellectual Views on Vegetarianism and Sikhism
Many articles have been written by Sikh intellectuals on this issue. A summary of their views is cited below .
Dr I. J Singh states that throughout Sikh history, there have been many subsects of Sikhism that have espoused vegetarianism however, this was rejected by the Sikh Guru's.[16] The Sikh thinking being that vegetarianism and meat eating was unimportant in the realm of spirituality. Surinder Singh Kohli links vegetarianism to Vashnavite behaviour.[17] Dr Gopal Singh commenting on meat being served in the langar during the time of Guru Angad [18] Dr Gyani Sher Singh who was the head Priest at the Golden temple comments that Ahimsa does not fit in with Sikh doctrine.[19] W. Owen Cole and Piara Singh Sambhi [20] comment that if the Sikh Guru's had made an issue on vegetarianism, it would have distracted from the main emphasis of Sikh spirituality. Dr H S Singha and Satwant Kaur [21] comment on how ritually slaughtered meat is considered a sin for initiated Sikhs. Dr Surinder Singh Kohli comments on the "Fools Wrangle Over Flesh"[22] quotation from the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji by how Guru Nanak mocked hypocritical vegetarian priests. Dr Gobind Mansukhi states how vegetarianism and meat eating has been left to the Sikh individual [23] G S Sidhu comments again on how ritually slaughtered meat is taboo for a Sikh [24] Dr Gurbakh Singh comments on how non-Kutha [25] meat is acceptable for the Sikhs. Dr Devinder Singh Chahal [26] comments on the difficulties of distinguishing between plant and animalin Sikh philosophy.Dr H S Singha comments in his book how the Sikh Guru's ate meat [27]
[edit] The Sikh Code of Conduct on the Vegetarian Issue
Leading Sikh intellectuals ruled on this issue in the 1920s (as some Sikh Sects confused the issue by trying to get all Sikhs to be vegetarian) and came up with the following rule or Code of Conduct for baptised Sikhs with regards to meat and Vegetarianism:
Sikh Rehat MaryadaThere are groups such as the Akhand Kirtani Jatha that dispute the meaning of the word Kuttha, and say it means all meat, however, in mainstream Sikhism this word has been accepted to mean, as that which is sacrificed for example Halal or Kosher.
— In the Rehat Maryada <Sikh Reht Maryada, The Definition of Sikh, Sikh Conduct & Conventions, Sikh Religion Living, India>, Section Six, it states:
The undermentioned four transgressions (tabooed practices) must be avoided
1. Dishonouring the hair;
2. Eating the meat of an animal slaughtered the Muslim way(Kutha);
3. Cohabiting with a person other than one's spouse
4. Using tobacco.
[edit] Historical dietary behaviour of Sikhs
There are a number of eyewitness accounts from European travellers as to the eating habits of Sikhs.[28] Although there is no prohibition on Sikhs for eating beef, it is clear that Sikhs as a mark of respect for their Hindu neighbours did not partake in eating beef.[29],[30] To initiate Mohammedans into their mysteries, one traveller said the Sikhs would prepare a Dish of Hogs legs.[31]
According to Dabistan e Mazhib (a contemporary Persian chronology of the Sikh Guru's) Guru Nanak (this differs from Dr I J Singh's research that states that Guru Nanak ate meat on the way to Kurukshetra [32]) did not eat meat, and Guru Arjan, one of successors, thought that meat eating was not in accordance with Nanak’s wishes. However, his son, Hargobind, ate meat and hunted, and his practice was adopted by most Sikhs.[33]
Bhai Gurdas who was a contemporary of the Sixth Sikh Guru, wrote Vaars (Poems/Couplets), to describe the behaviour of Sikhs at that time. In one of his Vaars actually praises the merits of goat meat [34]
[edit] See also
- Professor Gurbax Singh Dhillon - Meat Eating and Rehat Maryada
- Video Showing Jhatka at Hazoor Sahib
- The Sikhism Home Page
- The Sikhism Home Page
- The Sikhism Home Page
- The Sikhism Home Page
- The Sikhism Home Page
- FAQs About Sikhs | The Sikh Next Door | Education Curriculum About Sikhs and Sikh Religion
- http://www.sikhism.com/rehatmaryada
- Fools who wrangle over flesh | PopularSikh
- http://www.globalsikhstudies.net/pdf/Prespective_on_Sikh_tradition.pdf
- The Myth of Goat Sacrifice and Hazur Sahib
- Tenets of Guru Gobind Singh by Baldev Singh
- http://www.sikhism.com/rehatmaryada
- Kutha meat
- Jhatka
[edit] References
- ^ "Only Meat killed by Ritual is banned for a Sikh". Sgpc.net. Sikh Reht Maryada, The Definition of Sikh, Sikh Conduct & Conventions, Sikh Religion Living, India. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Sikh identity By Opinderjit Kaur Takhar". Books.google.co.uk. Sikh identity: an exploration of ... - Google Books. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Conscious eating By Gabriel Cousens". Books.google.co.uk. Conscious Eating - Google Books. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Sikh Identity: An Exploration of Groups Among Sikhs" by Opinderjit Kaur Takhar, pg. 51, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, 2005, ISBN 0754652025
- ^ "Philosophy of Guru Granth Sahib By Devinder Singh Sekhon, Singh, Devinder Page 143". Books.google.co.uk. History of Sikh Gurus Retold: 1469 ... - Google Books. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Sri Guru Granth Sahib". Sri Granth. Sri Granth: Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "History of Sikh Gurus Retold: 1469-1606 C.E By Surjit Singh Gandhi Page 95". Books.google.co.uk. History of Sikh Gurus Retold: 1469 ... - Google Books. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Sri Guru Granth Sahib". Sri Granth. Sri Granth: Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Page 787 Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji". Srigranth.org. Sri Granth: Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Sikhism, A Complete Introduction" by Dr. H.S. Singha & Satwant Kaur Hemkunt, Hemkunt Press, New Delhi, 1994, ISBN 81-7010-245-6
- ^ "Misconceptions About Eating Meat - Comments of Sikh Scholars by Sandeep Singh Brar". Sikhs.org. The Sikhism Home Page. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Faithandfood Fact Files - Sikhism". Faithandfood.com. global tolerance - communications with conscience. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Holla Mohalla". Singhsabha.com. Holla Mohalla. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Page 176 Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji". Srigranth.org. Sri Granth: Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ "Page 1289 Sri GuruGranth Sahib Ji". Srigranth.org. Sri Granth: Sri Guru Granth Sahib. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ Sikhs and Sikhism by I.J. Singh, Manohar, Delhi ISBN 9788173040580 Throughout Sikh history, there have been movements or subsects of Sikhism which have espoused vegetarianism. I think there is no basis for such dogma or practice in Sikhism. Certainly Sikhs do not think that a vegetarian's achievements in spirituality are easier or higher. It is surprising to see that vegetarianism is such an important facet of Hindu practice in light of the fact that animal sacrifice was a significant and much valued Hindu Vedic ritual for ages. Guru Nanak in his writings clearly rejected both sides of the arguments - on the virtues of vegetarianism or meat eating - as banal and so much nonsense, nor did he accept the idea that a cow was somehow more sacred than a horse or a chicken. He also refused to be drawn into a contention on the differences between flesh and greens, for instance. History tells us that to impart this message, Nanak cooked meat at an important Hindu festival in Kurukshetra. Having cooked it he certainly did not waste it, but probably served it to his followers and ate himself. History is quite clear that Guru Hargobind and Guru Gobind Singh were accomplished and avid hunters. The game was cooked and put to good use, to throw it away would have been an awful waste.
- ^ Guru Granth Sahib, An Analytical Study by Surindar Singh Kohli, Singh Bros. Amritsar ISBN 8172050607 The ideas of devotion and service in Vaishnavism have been accepted by Adi Granth, but the insistence of Vaishnavas on vegetarian diet has been rejected.
- ^ A History of the Sikh People by Dr. Gopal Singh, World Sikh University Press, Delhi ISBN 9788170231394 However, it is strange that now-a-days in the Community-Kitchen attached to the Sikh temples, and called the Guru's Kitchen (or, Guru-ka-langar) meat-dishes are not served at all. May be, it is on account of its being, perhaps, expensive, or not easy to keep for long. Or, perhaps the Vaishnava tradition is too strong to be shaken off.
- ^ Philosophy of Sikhism by Gyani Sher Singh (Ph.D), Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee. Amritsar As a true Vaisnavite Kabir remained a strict vegetarian. Kabir far from defying Brahmanical tradition as to the eating of meat, would not permit so much, as the plucking of a flower (G.G.S. pg 479), whereas Nanak deemed all such scruples to be superstitions, Kabir held the doctrine of Ahinsa or the non-destruction of life, which extended even to that of flowers. The Sikh Gurus, on the contrary, allowed and even encouraged, the use of animal flesh as food. Nanak has exposed this Ahinsa superstition in Asa Ki War (G.G.S. pg 472) and Malar Ke War (G.G.S. pg. 1288)
- ^ A Popular Dictionary of Sikhism, W.Owen Cole and Piara Singh Sambhi, England ISBN 978-0844204246 The Gurus were loath to pronounce upon such matters as the eating of meat or ways of disposing of the dead because undue emphasis on them could detract from the main thrust of their message which had to do with spiritual liberation. However, Guru Nanak did reject by implication the practice of vegetarianism related to ideas of pollution when he said, 'All food is pure; for God has provided it for our sustenance' (AG 472). Many Sikhs are vegetarian and meat should never be served at langar. Those who do eat meat are unlikely to include beef in their diet, at least in India, because of their cultural proximity to Hindus.
- ^ Sikhism, A Complete Introduction by Dr. H.S. Singha and Satwant Kaur, Hemkunt Press, Delhi SBN 81-7010-245-6 In general Sikhism has adopted an ambivalent attitude towards meat eating as against vegetarianism. But if meat is to be taken at all, Guru Gobind Singh enjoined on the Khalsa Panth not to take kosher meat ie. Halal meat slaughtered and prepared for eating according to the Islamic practice. In fact it is one of the kurahits for every amritdhari Sikh. One who infringes it becomes patit (apostate).
- ^ Real Sikhism by Surinder Singh Kohli, Harman Publishing, New Delhi ISBN 81-85151-64-4 A close study of the above-mentioned hymns of Guru Nanak Dev clarifies the Sikh standpoint regarding meat-eating. The Guru has not fallen into the controversy of eating or not eating animal food. He has ridiculed the religious priests for raising their voice in favour of vegetarianism. He called them hypocrites and totally blind to the realities of life. They are unwise and thoughtless persons, who do not go into the root of the matter. According to him, the water is the source of all life whether vegetable or animal. Guru Nanak Dev said. "None of the grain of corn is without life. In the first place, there is life in water, by which all are made green" (Var Asa M.1, p. 472). Thus there is life in vegetation and life in all types of creatures.
- ^ Introduction to Sikhism by Dr. Gobind Singh Mansukhani, Hemkunt Press, Delhi ISBN 81-7010-181-6 The Gurus neither advocate meat nor banned its use. They left it to the choice of the individual. There are passages against meat, in the Adi Granth. Guru Gobind Singh however prohibited for the Khalsa the use of Halal or Kutha meat prepared in the Muslim ritualistic way.
- ^ Introduction to Sikhism by G.S. Sidhu, Shromini Sikh Sangat, Toronto ISBN 0900692073 There are no restrictions for the Sikhs regarding food, except that the Sikhs are forbidden to eat meat prepared as a ritual slaughter. The Sikhs are asked to abstain from intoxicants.
- ^ The Sikh Faith by Gurbakhsh Singh, Canadian Sikh Study and Teaching Society, Vancouver ISBN 978-8172051884 According to the Maryada booklet 'Kutha', the meat prepared by the Muslim ritual, is prohibited for a Sikh. Regarding eating other meat, it is silent. From the prohibition of the Kutha meat, it is rightly presumed that non-Kutha meat is not prohibited for the Sikhs. Beef is prohibited to the Hindus and pork to the Muslims. Jews and Christians have their own taboos. They do not eat certain kinds of meat on certain days. Sikhs have no such instructions. If one thinks he needs to eat meat, it does not matter which meat it is, beef, poultry, fish, etc., or which day it is. One should, however, be careful not to eat any meat harmful for his health. Gurbani's instructions on this topic are very clear. "Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. Who can define what is meat and what is not meat? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?" (1289) The Brahmanical thought that a religious person should be a vegetarian is of recent origin. Earlier, Brahmans had been eating beef and horse meat. In conclusion, it is wrong to say that any person who eats meat (of course Kutha, because of the Muslim rituals is prohibited) loses his membership of the Khalsa and becomes an apostate.
- ^ Scientific Interpretation of Gurbani, Paper by Dr. Devinder Singh Chahal INTERPRETATION OF GURBANI:<br>A SCIENTIST'S APPROACH, UNDERSTANDING SIKHISM, The Research Journal (Devinder Singh Chahal, Ph.D.) The above discussion leads us to the conclusion that the Sikh Gurus made people aware of the fact that it is very difficult to distinguish between a plant and an animal, therefore, it is difficult to distinguish between a vegetarian and a non-vegetarian diets and there is no sin of eating food originating from plants or animals.
- ^ Mini Encyclopaedia of Sikhism by H.S. Singha, Hemkunt Press, Delhi.ISBN 8170102006 The practice of the Gurus is uncertain. Guru Nanak seems to have eaten venison or goat, depending upon different janamsakhi versions of a meal which he cooked at Kurukshetra which evoked the criticism of Brahmins. Guru Amardas ate only rice and lentils but this abstention cannot be regarded as evidence of vegetarianism, only of simple living. Guru Gobind Singh also permitted the eating of meat but he prescribed that it should be Jhatka meat and not Halal meat that is jagged in the Muslim fashion.
- ^ Siques, Tigers or Thieves Parmjit Singh & Amandeep Singh Madra ISBN 978140396201
- ^ William Francklin in his writing about Mr George Thomas 1805 The Seiks receive Proselytes of almost every Cast, a point in which they differ most materially from the Hindoos. To initiate Mohammedans into their mysteries, they prepare a Dish of Hogs legs, which the Converts are obliged to partake of, previous to admission………………..They are not prohibited the use of Animal food of any kind, excepting Beef, which they are rigidly scrupulous in abstaining from.
- ^ Extract from an officer in the Bengal Army and is taken from the Asiatic Annual Register 1809 The seiks are remarkably fond of the flesh of the jungle hog, which they kill in chase: this food is allowable by their law. They likewise eat of mutton and fish; but these being unlawful the Brahmins will not partake, leaving those who chose to transgress their institutes to answer for themselves.
- ^ John Griffiths writes in February 17th 1794 Now become a Singh, he is a heterodox, and distinct from the Hindoos by whom he is considered an apostate. He is not restricted in his diet, but is allowed, by the tenets of his new religion, to devour whatever food his appetite may prompt, excepting beef.
- ^ Sikhs and Sikhism by I.J. Singh, Manohar, Delhi ISBN 9788173040580
- ^ Grewal, J.S. Sikh History from Persian Sources: Translations of Major Texts ISBN 978-8185229171 Many person became his disciples. Nanak believed in the Oneness of God and in the way that it is asserted in Muhammadan theology. He also believed in transmigration of souls. Holding wine and pork to be unlawful, he had [himself] abandoned eating meat. He decreed avoidance of causing harm to animals. It was after his time that meat-eating spread amongst his followers. Arjan Mal, who was on of his lineal succesors, found this to be evil. He prohibited people from eating meat, saying “This is not in accordance with Nanak’s wishes”. Later, Hargobind, son of Arjan Mal, ate meat and took to hunting. Most of their [the Gurus] followers adopted his practice.
- ^ Vaaran Bhai Gurdas :Vaar23Pauri13:SearchGurbani.com The proud elephant is inedible and none eats the mighty lion. Goat is humble and hence it is respected everywhere. On occasions of death, joy, marriage, yajna, etc only its meat dis accepted. Among the householders its meat is acknowledged as sacred and with its gut stringed instruments are made. From its leather the shoes are made to be used by the saints merged in their meditation upon the Lord. Drums are mounted by its skin and then in the holy congregation the delight-giving kirtan, eulogy of the Lord, is sung. In fact, going to the holy congregation is the same as going to the shelter of the true Guru.
I want to reply on the following comment:
"Meat and Eggs
Except my father, we as a family don't eat meat or eggs. I know that the Guru Granth doesn't talk much about meat/eggs. If anyone can express there Philosopy on it, I would appericiate it."
I guess you are not aware that Guru Granth Sahib Ji talks about not eating meat and alcohol. Sri Guru Granth Sahib prohibits eating animal flesh in clear-cut and unambiguous language in a number of places.
Please read the following shabads and the panna and its meaning is also given along with them...
"Jee Badhoh So Dharam Kar Thaapoh, Adharam Kaho Kat Bhai.
Anpas Ko Munwar Kar Thaapoh, Kaa Ko Kaho Kasaaee."(Panna 1103)
You kill animals and call it religion (Rahit); then what indeed is irreligion (Kurahit)? Even then you
consider yourself as a sage of sages; then whom to call a butcher?
"Bed Parhey Mukh Mitthee Baani.
Jeeaan KUHAT Na Sangey Paraanee" (Panna 201)
He (Pandit) recites the Vedas very sweetly, but he does not hesitate to kill life.
"Abhakhya Ka Kuthha Bakra Khanaa.
Choukay Upar Kisey Na Jaanaa" (Panna 472)
They eat the meat obtained while uttering the unspeakable word (referring to Qalima of the Muslims which the hindus considered as unspeakable) and allow none to enter their kitchen square.
"Bed Kateb Kaho Mat Jhoothhay, jhoothhaa jo Na Bichaarey.
Jo Sabh Meh Ek Khudai Kahat Ho, Tio Kio Murghi Maarey" (Panna 1350)
Do not call various religious texts false. False is one who gives no thought to their contents. If you consider God is in all, then why you slaughter the chicken (i.e. life?)
"Rojaa Dharey, Manaavey Mlah, Svaadat Jee Sanghaarey.
Aapaa Deldi Avar Nahin Dekhey, Kaahey Kow Jhakh Maarey" (Panna 1375)
You keep fasts (i.e. religious acts) to appease God. At the same time you slay life for your relish. This utter selfishness is nothing but empty or nonsensical talk.
"Kabir Jee Jo Maareh Jor Kar, Kaahtey Heh Ju Halaal.
Dafter Daee Jab Kaadh Hai, Hoegaa Kaun Havaal" (Panna 1375)
Whosoever slays life by force and call it sanctified; What will be his fate when he will be called to account for it in His Court?
"Kabir Khoob Khanna Khichri, Ja Meh Amrit Lon Heraa
rotee Kaarney Galaa Kataavey Kon" (Panna 1374)
Blessed is the simple of food of rice mixed with salt; Who would risk his head to be slain hereafter, for the meat one eats here?
"Kabir Bhaang, Mach Iiii Surapaan Jo Jo Praanee Khahey.
Tirath, Barat, Nem Kiaye Te Sabhay Rasaatal Jahey" (Panna 1377)
Whosoever eats flesh, fish, etc. and takes wine and hemp, all his religious acts will go to waste.
I hope the above shabads will answer your question.
Gur Fateh!
Binwant