Re: An ex-Sikh’s Journey in Faith
Pukandi Baba said:
I think your mistaken my dear fellow.
This statement you've made about 'God has no words' is incorrect. The Bible says in the beginning there was the word of God - Now how is that any different? The Shabad in the Guru Granth Sahib ji is the word of God that was elivered via the Gurus AND other holy saints. In the Bible there is only words that have been delivered via the disciples. aand not Jesus!
And I think that the Bible is as wrong as Sikkhs who claim that it contains 'the word of God'.
The Granth is:
1. - A set of moral codes to give to a barbaric world.
2. - A way of thinking about God that does not lay any importance at the feet of names, idols, rituals, etc.
The world of Guru Nanak was a world apart to the one in which we live now. Things we take for granted today such as equal rights between genders and races, etc was an alien concept at the time. Today, inequality is considered the absurdity.
But despite the habbits of men having change (generally) for the better, there are still holes in our conduct. If there were not, then there would have been no Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Nor would there have been a Holocaust...or all of the inhumanity that still exists today.
It's far less than what it once was, but when human beings get into seemingly more complex situations, they lost their moral center and get sucked into the world of the Five Thieves, even if they are essentially good people.
In the cyber-world of the 21st century global village, Nanakian philosophy offers a way to get people to find their moral centers when the world starts to carry them away from moralistic actions. Whether a man reads the advice of Confucius, invests in the nobility of Christ's words when addressing humanity, or uses the Granth's teachings, it matters not which way we choose. What matters is the end product: that we become full, happy and morally fulfilled human benigs.
And the greatest judge of that is your own heart.
Satyaban said:
I am neither a Christian or Sikh and sacrfice is a hard concept for me to reconcile with karma. Karma is a natural law and universal. That is Karma is the law everywhere in this universe. I have a hard time believing God would suspend any of his laws for benefit of mankind, we are not the crown of creation the universe is.
Peace
Satyaban
"Sacrifice" is necessary for any kind of acheivement.
You must sacrifice in order to well in exams. You must sacrifice in order to create a successful family and raise children. You must sacrifice when you want to excel at your career.
And - like Guru Gobind Singh Ji - you must sacrifice in order to help acheive a world that is closer to an all-accepting, secularist democracy whereby all human beings can live as human beings. The Khalsa were created for no other reason than to protect the sanctity of basic human rights of
other people. The Guru even went into talks with the Mughal emperor in an attempt to negotiate the laws of the empire into something that was more secularist and accepting...even
after the deaths of his father and two of his youngest sons at the hands of that same emperor.
Revenge has no place in Sikkhi, because of the Ek Onkar concept. 'Enemies' and 'friends', 'life' and 'death'...these are all words given by the human mind in its feeble attempt to describe a universe it can never understand. None of these things actually exist.
The Gurus understood this.
The Sikkhs do not.